True Maroon

.......albeit in different sports. Mullen and Stansbury. Stansbury has taken State to 6 NCAA berths in 14 years. Would we be satisfied if Mullen led State to 6 bowl games in 14 years? Would he still be HC? Just askin"......

Here's something to ponder:

If Stansbury isn't the recruiter that the apologists say he is, does that mean he needs to go? Shane's comments seem to indicate that he isn't able to bring in the top level talent to State, as people have said. Most would agree x's and o's, motivation, and in-game adjustments aren't in Stansbury's toolbox. So if he isn't the elite recruiter, and he isn't able to "coach em up", what's left? I'm just asking the question. I was on the fence about Stansbury going into this season.

Last night was yet another look at what we seem to have with Stansbury as coach into the future. Another display of inconsistent play. Moving forward.....State will probably win a couple of games in the SEC tournament, make the NCAA tournament, and the apologists will come out of the woodwork and ask, "who could we get better than Stansbury?" Stansbury does "JUST ENOUGH", to make this a debate.

14 years is plenty long enough to see what you have. We're not going to see anything dramatically different than what we've endured for the past 14. "Just Enough To Make It A Debate".